OBJECTIVES OF
THE FORUM
The
Vilnius International Forum on Holocaust-Era Looted
Cultural Assets was build on the work of the
1997 London Conference on Nazi Gold,
the
1998 Washington Conference on Holocaust - Era
Assets, and the
2000 Stockholm International Forum on the
Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research.
It concentrated specifically on cultural assets and
implemented
Resolution No.1205 (1999) “Looted Jewish Cultural
Property” of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe [ Emanuelis Zingeris,
Rapporteur], which called for an European
Conference to discuss the return of looted cultural
property.
It reviewed and discussed challenges in the
implementation of the
Washington Conference Principles on Nazi - Confiscated
Art.
The Vilnius Forum was being convened to discuss legal,
historical, archival and museum-related problems related
to the search, identification, and restitution of
plundered cultural artifacts enabling experts from
various countries better to evaluate activities and
future undertakings of various disparate databanks and
restitution organizations. The challenge of the
conference was to establish global transparency of
archival databases and museum collections.
In addition to plenary sessions, workshops was held on
the following topics:
National delegations and
participants of the Vilnius Forum were invited:
|
· |
to present information on specific
accomplishments in identification of looted
cultural artifacts of Holocaust victims and on
the current status of efforts to implement their
return to rightful owners. States and
participants may also discuss continuing
problems they face and possible solutions;
|
|
· |
to share experience in restoration of “plundered
pasts,” of practical effects of legal
regulations covering the search, identification,
and return of cultural assets of Holocaust
victims;
|
|
· |
to discuss needs for politicians, lawyers,
historians, and museum curators in various
countries to disseminate information on the
collection of the cultural assets of Holocaust
victims in order to
1) facilitate their return to the general
cultural context of their provenance and
2) to evaluate the activities of member states
of the Council of Europe as well as of
collectors, auctioneers, and museums in the
fulfillment of recommendations and resolutions
adopted by the Council;
|
|
· |
to discuss the problem of the intellectual
property of Holocaust victims, including the
possibility of setting up a unified archival
data base widely accessible from various
countries;
|
|
· |
to formulate a general declaration by
participants to be used in establishing a legal
framework to implement prior resolutions on
cultural policy, legislation, museum
administration, and archival work.
|
|